hachyderm.io is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Hachyderm is a safe space, LGBTQIA+ and BLM, primarily comprised of tech industry professionals world wide. Note that many non-user account types have restrictions - please see our About page.

Administered by:

Server stats:

9.3K
active users

If — here's hoping, and I dare to hope — if we not only get a Harris presidency but Dem control of both houses of Congress, let's light a hell of a fire under our reps to slam the door shut on right-leaning minoritarian rule in the US.

•That• is how we end up not fighting fascism by the skin of our teeth in every singly election in the near/medium term.

From @sysadmin1138:
ngmx.com/@sysadmin1138/1128895

NGMXSysAdmin1138 (@sysadmin1138@ngmx.com)Content warning: uspol, optimism

To be clear, by “minoritarian rule,” I mean the situation where a specific subset of the country that is substantially less than a majority still manages to win elections & control policy.

What stops that? Things like…
- a new and stronger VRA (we were so close, but for Manchin & co)
- a (more) proportional Senate
- ending the filibuster
- ending the EC (or finishing the NPVIC)
- SCOTUS reform
- etc etc

@inthehands I’m all for these ideas, but how are you planning to get the necessary constitutional amendments passed?

Paul Cantrell

@provuejim
None require a constitutional amendment except (1) the proportional senate (but see downthread re majority filibuster) and (2) fully abolishing EC instead of using NPVIC.

@inthehands SCOTUS reform can be done with a bare majority? If so, cool, but. I’ll bet the current SCOTUS won’t agree. Of course SCOTUS invented their authority to judge the constitutionality of legislation over 200 years ago. In school I was taught that was a good thing, now I’m not so sure.

@provuejim
Basic reform requires either 60 votes or filibuster elimination, I believe. Either way, no constitutional amendment needed; it’s only an act of Congress.

@provuejim @inthehands Most democracies have a constitutional court, and it is a good thing, because it acts as a safeguard. The problem of the US implementation is, in my opinion, common law – most democracies in the world use civil law, so their constitutional courts cannot make stuff up, if it is not explicitly written, it is not there. In most countries things like abortion or gay marriage are *not* decided by the courts, but by some legislative change.