Plugins for fediverse platforms.
Where is this up to? Is anyone thinking along these lines?
I've seen @db0 espouse such (eg https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/8581651) (sorry for the tag if annoying).
I've certainly thought of it myself ... because it's a pretty obvious idea for an ecosystem aiming for richness and sustainability.
Seems a perfect fit for reusable moderation tooling too, rather than each new platforms having that trouble.
This is essentially #bluesky 's idea it seems.
@fediverse
#fediverse
lemmy.dbzer0.comI am extremely grateful to everybody involved with Lemmy. That includes you! - Divisions by zero# Hello! I am sunaurus, the head admin of lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee]. Ever since I
created my instance, I have been following a lot of public and private
discussion channels between different parties involved with Lemmy. As I’m sure
many others have also noticed, the discussions in such channels sometimes get
heated, and in fact recently, I feel like there has been a constant trend in
these discussions towards a lot of demands, hostility, negativity, and a general
lack of empathy between different participants in the Lemmy network. I am
writing this post for a few reasons: 1. I would like add a bit of positivity by
expressing my gratitude towards every single person who has helped improve
Lemmy. 2. I want to speak up in defense of different people who have been
receiving negativity lately. 3. There are a few false rumors spreading on Lemmy,
which I would like to try and counteract with very simple evidence. 4. I want to
remind everybody that at the end of the day, all of us care about building and
improving Lemmy. We all have the same goal, and it’s too easy to lose sight of
that. I will split up what I want to say in this post by different user groups -
users, mods, admins and developers. I understand that many people belong to
several (or even all) of these groups, but I just want to highlight the value
of, and express my gratitude to each group separately. ### Users At the end of
the day, Lemmy would not be worth anything without the users. Users bring Lemmy
to life by posting great content, getting involved in discussions in comments,
helping surface interesting content for others through voting and even keeping
the platform clean through reports. I am extremely thankful for all the users
who have given me so much enjoyment on this platform. I believe that users often
get treated unfairly on Lemmy based on what instance they are participating
from. I’m sure so many of you have noticed comments around Lemmy along the lines
of “Oh, another user from <instance>, I’m going to completely ignore your stupid
takes”. I’ve also many cases of people treating users as second-class citizen if
they are not on the same instance - for example, I’ve seen users who are active
and valuable participants in communities on another instance receive comments
like “why are you participating in our discussions, go back to your own
instance”. In my opinion this is completely counterproductive to the whole idea
of federation. On a human level, I can understand it - you’re far more likely to
notice or remember what instance somebody is posting from if you have a negative
experience. As a result, as time goes by, people tend to develop negative views
of each instance, despite potentially having had many positive interactions with
other users of those same instances. The message I want to put out here is that
instances, especially bigger ones, are not monoliths - do not judge users based
on what instance they are browsing Lemmy from, judge them by their actual words
and actions. ### Mods There are some excellent communities already on Lemmy, and
these communities are all continuously being built up and maintained by mods.
Mods put in huge amounts of their free time and energy in order to provide
spaces for all Lemmy users. They form the first line of defense against bad
actors, they keep communities alive and often receive no praise, only criticism.
I am very grateful to everybody who has dedicated time to building communities
on Lemmy. Users rarely notice the lengths mods go to in order to keep
communities running smoothly - mods more often than not only get noticed when
users disagree with some mod actions. I believe mods deserve a lot better than
this. Constructive criticism can of course be useful to improve communities, but
it must be balanced with empathy and kindness towards people who have been
putting in effort to provide something for users. Remember that there is another
human being reading your words when you start writing about the mods of any
particular community. Users who are not happy with mods of a certain community
always have the opportunity to start their own community and run it as they
like. ### Admins Admins provide two main key functions for the network: 1.
Taking care of the actual infrastructure of Lemmy 2. Working as a higher level
defense against bad actors, in cases where mods are not enough I can tell from
my own experience that being an admin of a bigger instance requires constant
energy and attention. I don’t believe that there is a single medium-to-big
instance where the admins have not put in hundreds (if not thousands) of hours
of their free time, as well as in many cases, probably their own money. This is
a service which admins provide for free, and it is necessary in order to keep
the Lemmy network healthy. I have endless respect for anybody who is willing to
put themselves in the position of a Lemmy admin. I have seen awful messages
towards admins from all the other groups listed here, including other admins.
These messages range from condescending and rude, to downright hateful. I have
seen admins treated as useless and their work taken for granted. I have seen
people getting frustrated with admins for not spending every waking minute on
Lemmy. I have seen some users consistently spreading provably false rumors about
particular admins in an effort to tarnish their reputation on Lemmy. Before you
take out frustration on admins, please remember that they are also humans who
have been working tirelessly to improve Lemmy in their own way. Also, a
reminder: the absolute best feature of Lemmy is that users are free to pick
their instance - and as a result, users are also free to pick their admins. Even
more than that, users can always become their own admins by spinning up their
own instance. Yes, this requires dedication, effort, and research, but that’s
exactly my point. It’s not easy running an instance, and mistreating people who
do this as a free service is completely unacceptable. ### Developers Lemmy
development has been lead by a few key maintainers, with a massive amount of
smaller contributors. The software is constantly being improved at a very good
pace, and everybody is able to benefit from this effort at no cost whatsoever. I
am extremely grateful to everybody who has participated in the development of
the Lemmy software, and other related software, as without you folks, none of us
would even be here now. There seems to be a huge amount of people with very
little appreciation of the work that has gone into the software. I’m sure many
of you have seen countless messages where people express that the devs should be
doing more in one way or another. “They should work faster”, “they should
prioritize this obviously most important feature”, “they should be available
24/7 to offer support”, etc. I just want to take a moment here and acknowledge
what core maintainers have already done for Lemmy: * Years worth of work on the
code itself * Offering support to the community and other admins * Reviewing
literally thousands of pull requests on GitHub * Acting fast in stressful
situations where the Lemmy network has been overloaded * Not abandoning the
project in the face of constant hateful users * Sacrificing literally hundreds
of thousands of euros in missed salaries which they could have been getting if
they were working for a tech company instead of working on Lemmy I also want to
take this moment to discredit some rumors which I have seen repeated too many
times: 1. Rumor: Lemmy devs do not accept outside code contributions This is
completely false - the maintainers are completely open to (and even constantly
asking for) contributions. When somebody starts contributing, they will receive
support and code reviews very quickly. I can tell you that I have experienced
this myself several times, but that’s anecdotal, so let me also provide
evidence: a. Contributors list for the Lemmy backend:
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/graphs/contributors
[https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/graphs/contributors] b. Contributors list for
Lemmy UI: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/graphs/contributors
[https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/graphs/contributors] Both of these lists
include 100 different names, and that’s only because GitHub literally caps these
pages to 100 users. Actually, the amount of different contributors is even
bigger. If Lemmy devs did not accept and encourage outside contributions, then
there would be no way for these lists to be so big. 2. Rumor: Lemmy devs work
too slowly This is an extremely entitled and frankly stupid claim. I try to keep
on top of the changes made in the Lemmy repo, and let me tell you, the pace of
improvement is very good. I very firmly believe that if the network started
downgrading to Lemmy versions from ~8 months ago, the whole network would just
collapse, as none of the instances could keep up with the current volume. That
is to say, we have come an extremely long way since last summer alone. Let me
provide some more evidence. Take a look at the Pulse page for the Lemmy backend
on GitHub: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pulse
[https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pulse]. As of writing this, Lemmy devs have
merged 18 pull requests in the week leading up to this post - that’s an average
of 2.5 merged PRs per day. This is extremely good for a project with a small
underfunded team. 3. Rumor: Lemmy devs do not prioritize the important issues
There are two sides to this. First of all, there are endless users who turn to
the Lemmy devs with what they believe is the most important issue and should
immediately be prioritized - the problem is that almost none of these endless
users have the same view of what the most important issue actually is! In that
sense, it’s literally impossible to please everybody, because everybody wants
different things. On the other hand, even when Lemmy devs do prioritize things
which some users have been desperately asking for, I have on several occasions
seen a dismissive response along the lines of “too little too late”. Basically,
the demands made are often unrealistic and impossible to meet. If you are
somebody who feels like Lemmy devs are not doing enough, I would ask you to
please take a step back, look at the actual contributions which they have made,
and consider how you yourself would feel if after making such a massive
contribution, you would still need to listen to countless strangers on the
internet tell you how you’re not good enough in their opinion. ### Conclusion
Lastly, I am very thankful to anybody who took the time to read to the end of
this post. Again, my goal is to try and defuse some of the hostility, as well as
to put out a message of gratitude and positivity. I am very interested in the
success of Lemmy as a whole, and that is much easier to achieve and maintain if
we all work together. Thank you, I hope you’re doing well, and have a nice
weekend!