Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
hachyderm.io is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Hachyderm is a safe space, LGBTQIA+ and BLM, primarily comprised of tech industry professionals world wide. Note that many non-user account types have restrictions - please see our About page.

Administered by:

Server stats:

9.4K
active users

hachyderm.io: AboutStatusProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.7

#aisec

1 post1 participant0 posts today
0x40k<p>AI Security &amp; Compliance - whew, that's a tough one, right? 🤯</p><p>No doubt, AI can seriously level up security efforts. But then there's that whole GRC (Governance, Risk, Compliance) headache... Sound familiar?</p><p>Picture this: Your client's hyped about deploying a new AI-powered firewall, but then Legal and Data Protection slam on the brakes. Classic scenario! It really is a tricky balancing act.</p><p>Honestly, AI isn't just an 'install and forget' kind of deal. You've *gotta* stay proactive and really bake security in right from the beginning – thinking 'security by design' is crucial. Otherwise, you get stuck in that frustrating loop: no budget means skimping on security, but weak security makes getting that budget approved way harder... 🤦</p><p>So, let's talk real challenges. What are *your* biggest pain points when dealing with AI security? Spill the beans below! 👇</p><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/AISec" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AISec</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/GRC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GRC</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/Pentest" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Pentest</span></a></p>
Slim Bill (He/Him)<p>Spoke with a client who believes that AI will catch half of all computer security breaches in the future. That's wasteful. Here's why:<br>A mature solution should not just trap the breach, but it should also generate the appropriate use case so automation will catch any recurrences. That's what a CMMi level 3 organization will do; AI shouldn't regress the organization.<br>AI will catch about 5 percent of all security breaches. 95 percent will be caught by less resource-intensive technologies.<br><a href="https://noc.social/tags/aisec" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>aisec</span></a></p>
Zate 🦘🇦🇺<p>Listening to a book on <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> and they just said something to the tune of </p><blockquote><p>Just as malware and spam have been reduced to merely occasional incidents, in the future, subversion of <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> will be rare.</p></blockquote><p>Almost spat out my drink.</p><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/aisec" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>aisec</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/fuckaroundandfindout" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>fuckaroundandfindout</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/nothowthisworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>nothowthisworks</span></a></p>
ExploreLive feeds
About