hachyderm.io is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Hachyderm is a safe space, LGBTQIA+ and BLM, primarily comprised of tech industry professionals world wide. Note that many non-user account types have restrictions - please see our About page.

Administered by:

Server stats:

9K
active users

You’ll have the flexibility to work as much or as little as you choose - 20hrs/week is suggested, but not a limit. Start working in as little as 48 hours. Your final hourly rate will be chosen by Outlier AI and determined by your location.
lmao no fuck offffffffff

my final hourly rate will be
chosen by a fucking ML model?? That shit cannot be legal.

EDIT: Naming and shaming this one:
https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/4047619141/

EDIT 2: As a few people have pointed out, apparently "Outlier AI" is a
company, not the name of their model. This all still sucks ass (in a bad way) and I am quite sure you're not going to get paid very much, but it's potentially at least not pay-rate-by-ML-model. I doubt there's much transparency or fairness in the pay though.

The company, which bills itself as a full end to end AI hiring pipeline, gave very little confidence that your pay amount would not be decided upon by an ML model, hence my lack of any benefit of the doubt. So I still wouldn't trust them any further than I could throw them, but.

It's... I hesitate to say
better, because you're ostensibly training your replacement for an unknown-at-this-time sum.

@aud some business people are going to use it until a court makes them stop

@hipsterelectron@circumstances.run "We see you have spent the entire past month working 160 hours! Wow! When we combine that with the ethnicity and gender of your name, some data we bought from a data broker, and certain skull measurements, our Outlier AI model tells us that why, you're lucky to even work! You're welcome for the experience!"

@aud "certain" skull measurements because everyone knows some of them aren't worth shit. we stay up to date with leading skull scientists to get you the best of the best top tier eugenics

@hipsterelectron@circumstances.run I still can't fucking believe (yes I can) that they just... actually try this shit

https://journalofbigdata.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40537-019-0282-4

hilariously, a search for "phrenology" in the yields nothing. Strange.

SpringerOpenRETRACTED ARTICLE: Criminal tendency detection from facial images and the gender bias effect - Journal of Big DataExplosive performance and memory space growth in computing machines, along with recent specialization of deep learning models have radically boosted the role of images in semantic pattern recognition. In the same way that a textual post on social media reveals individual characteristics of its author, facial images may manifest some personality traits. This work is the first milestone in our attempt to infer personality traits from facial images. With this ultimate goal in mind, here we explore a new level of image understanding, inferring criminal tendency from facial images via deep learning. In particular, two deep learning models, including a standard feedforward neural network (SNN) and a convolutional neural network (CNN) are applied to discriminate criminal and non-criminal facial images. Confusion matrix and training and test accuracies are reported for both models, using tenfold cross-validation on a set of 10,000 facial images. The CNN was more consistent than the SNN in learning to reach its best test accuracy, which was 8% higher than the SNN’s test accuracy. Next, to explore the classifier’s hypothetical bias due to gender, we controlled for gender by applying only male facial images. No meaningful discrepancies in classification accuracies or learning consistencies were observed, suggesting little to no gender bias in the classifier. Finally, dissecting and visualizing convolutional layers in CNN showed that the shape of the face, eyebrows, top of the eye, pupils, nostrils, and lips are taken advantage of by CNN in order to classify the two sets of images.

@aud amazed that they actually got it retracted maybe there is some hope of resistance

@hipsterelectron@circumstances.run only because other researchers had to take the time to target it, basically: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.03895

@aud @hipsterelectron seems like a good use of time to take that horse shit down tho.

@cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run Oh, I mean, definitely, I agree, like obviously they're trying to push it and it would have worked. But it's obviously bullshit they had to. I feel like if you accept "phrenology but with a computer" you should not get to be a journal anymore because what the fuck is even the point of you being a gatekeeper if you can't keep the goddamned debunked science out?

@aud @hipsterelectron @cthos Just suggesting anything vaguely adjacent to phrenology should be a lifetime ban from publishing in any journal or holding professorship at any university worldwide.

Cassandrich

@aud @hipsterelectron @cthos Our institutions should have registers of "nazi adjacent pseudosciences" and the political will to state unequivocally that reviving anything resembling them is not an option and will result in complete excommunication from academia.

@dalias @aud @cthos our institutions could be able to misuse that so it shouldn't be self-regulation but rather an audit by an external authority at least. universities are able to retain a multitude of tax breaks which could easily be used to curb their behavior although i don't like the precedent of right wing governments making gender illegal there either

@hipsterelectron @aud @cthos My leaning would be more like professional ethics association/union imposing it.

@hipsterelectron @aud @cthos The majority of academics are not friendly to nazi adjacent ideas. Just need the organization & will to act in unison to refuse to work or associate with anyone who is.

@dalias @aud @cthos was thinking about IEEE from above and the royal society from last week as standards setting orgs. have been incredibly impressed w the support from AAUP for protests at universities last year

@hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @dalias@hachyderm.io @cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev it took a hot minute, but I did figure out where the contact author / PI is working. It was a little difficult since the paper has been retracted and isn’t really linked anywhere, but they are indeed a professor at a university… much to my displeasure.

@aud @hipsterelectron @cthos We should also have students organizing to oust nazi professors.

@dalias @aud @cthos was rly upsetting how student advocacy failed to oust shai davidai at columbia (who had been advocating for violence against many students) until he threatened an admin

@aud @dalias @hipsterelectron @cthos we'll never find out who, but I'd like to have a word with their accepting reviewers more than anything

@wen @aud @hipsterelectron @cthos I really want to see hacktivism outing nazi collaborators becoming a thing. None of these institutions they infest have any security hygiene. May they all get popped.

@dalias @wen @aud @cthos travis brown doesn't really do hacktivism per se but he does identify nazis with poor opsec and is a huge inspiration to me

travisbrown.devtravisbrown.dev

@dalias @hipsterelectron @aud @cthos yeah, more, smaller power structures that hold each other accountable.

@dalias @hipsterelectron @aud @cthos it matters how independent an institution is, but being independent is not enough to keep it from becoming oppressive. we should never build institutions that would be too strong for future activists to dismantle if the need arose.