hachyderm.io is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Hachyderm is a safe space, LGBTQIA+ and BLM, primarily comprised of tech industry professionals world wide. Note that many non-user account types have restrictions - please see our About page.

Administered by:

Server stats:

8.9K
active users

🚨 Let’s Encrypt at risk from Trump cuts to OTF: “Let’s Encrypt received around $800,000 in funding from the OTF”

Dear @EUCommission, get your heads out of your arses and let’s find @letsencrypt €1M/year (a rounding error in EU finances) and have them move to the EU.

If Let’s Encrypt is fucked, the web is fucked, and the Small Web is fucked too. So how about we don’t let that happen, yeah?

(In the meanwhile, if the Let’s Encrypt folks want to make a point about how essential they are, it might be an idea to refuse certificates to republican politicians. See how they like their donation systems breaking in real time…)

CC @nlnet @NGIZero@mastodon.xyz

#USA #fascism #OpenTechFund #LetsEncrypt #SSL #TLS #encryption #EU #web #tech #SmallWeb #SmallTech mastodon.social/@publictorsten

Mastodonpublictorsten (@publictorsten@mastodon.social)Wenn Let’s Encrypt plötzlich nicht mehr klappt, wird das halbe Internet aus Zertifikatsfehlern bestehen. https://www.heise.de/news/Nach-Trump-Dekret-Kampf-um-US-Foerdermittel-fuer-Tor-F-Droid-und-Let-s-Encrypt-10328226.html

@aral they can't. that'd completely go against their values.
this is like asking them to refuse letsencrypt in Russia, they can't. it's an automated certificate system, they can't just prevent the issuing certificates simply because of their party.

even big websites, like the national security agency, and even whitehouse.gov use letsencrypt as well, so it wouldn't be a good sign for anyone.

Cassandrich

@adisonverlice If "following your values" prevents you from taking material action to impede the advance of nazis, you need to reevaluate or reprioritize your values.

@dalias I see where you're going with this. but again, let's put out the hypothetical senarios that the letsencrypt foundation stopped the (nazi's) stopped issuing certificates for them.
again, this will not slow them down, as again, they can turn to other paid providers who will gladly do it to them. again, take digicert. they issue certs for almost all of the government sites becides the NSA and few others. for example, defense.gov uses digicert. so if the (nazi's) wanted to, they could simply use digicert, it's not out of their budget. also, don't forget about GTS (google trust services) and also cloud flare.
so it would slow them down at best, do nothing at worst

U.S. Department of DefenseU.S. Department of DefenseThe Department of Defense is America's largest government agency. With our military tracing its roots back to pre-Revolutionary times, the department has grown and evolved with our nation.

@adisonverlice @dalias "Everyone" excepts those the US government doesn't like. They don't issue (and revoke them if they did) to entities under US sanctions.

@tdelmas @dalias no I'm not talking about the government issuing certs, i'm talking about letsencrypt.

even still, I think the point still stands