hachyderm.io is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Hachyderm is a safe space, LGBTQIA+ and BLM, primarily comprised of tech industry professionals world wide. Note that many non-user account types have restrictions - please see our About page.

Administered by:

Server stats:

8.9K
active users

Adrianna Tan

I scanned the same photo 3 different ways.

1. Fuji Frontier
2. Nikon Coolscan 8000 ED with VueScan + NLP
3. Nikon Coolscan 8000 ED with VueScan color inversion for Kodak Portra setting

Pros and cons to each type of scanning.

Once I get NikonScan working, I will compare that as well.

Right now my 2 main fave ways to scan are with Fuji Frontier (I rent it at a darkroom) or with my CoolScan with VueScan and NLP.

@skinnylatte First is my favorite there, but they all look good to me

@middleclasstool yeah the frontier is the best. That’s what labs use

@skinnylatte The color inversion one is bright but it feels like the wrong kind of bright, if that makes sense

@middleclasstool yeah the default settings are quite off for Vuescan for out of the box inversion. It’s an easy fix, but it’s also work

@skinnylatte Which one do you think turned out the best?

We attempted to scan a glossy photo on a home scanner, and the colors were weirdly oversaturated. I ended up carefully taking a photo of the other photo, and hopefully it is good enough.

@sepdroid the Fuji is always the best out of the box. It’s the machine that photo labs use when you get them to scan. The other 2 are home scanners so anything even vaguely close to the Fuji makes me happy. Comes down to diff workflows

@sepdroid for scanning a printed photo try Google PhotoScan. I use it to keep a record of childhood pics when I visit my parents

@skinnylatte Interesting. lots of color differences. I notice the blue/purple area under the counter holding the straws the most. The first is really blue while the others trend towards lavender. Which one is truer to the original? The Fuji?

@CavedaleRhones there’s no true in color photography, everything is about preference

I like colors that pop so I like the Fuji but some people prefer flatter color images. It’s all an interpretation, just like our cameras and even our eyes are an interpretation of the world

@skinnylatte @CavedaleRhones well the buckets change color, and that's not subjective/preference.

edit: guess it's a stack of trays, not a square bucket.

@skinnylatte I like 2 the best. Feels most like I’m there seeing it with my eyes, but maybe that’s not the point of every photo

@chad thanks! I like 1 and 2, 2 is something I feel I have more control over as I’m tweaking it a lot to look like what I remember so that’s my interpretation, but the Fuji is an interpretation of the machine I used to scan it

@skinnylatte Thanks for posting this! Out of curiosity, have you had much luck scanning negatives on a flatbed scanner? I recall that working at least as well as a dedidcated (home) film scanner for B&W work (mostly Polaroid 55) the last time I was scanning lots of negatives.

@mattblaze I don’t like flatbeds as much but may go that way soon for 4x5. I think they’re fine if you have good holders. I’ve had mostly crappy ones so far.

@skinnylatte My family business was a photo lab. The Fuji Fronteir was a workhorse - we had two of those machines.

The digital photo printer on the Frontier was also great.

I miss those days.

@Champagne I love these machines. Try to use one whenever I can (I can rent them hourly)