Jack Dorsey explaining exactly why no single company should own a social media platform.
But Jack Dorsey also still prefers that Elon Musk own Twitter instead of a bank.
Which is a wild thing to say knowing what we know now.
Call me crazy, but if I was in Jack Dorsey’s position, I would have converted Twitter into a consumer-owned and worker-owned co-op.
Sell it to everyone who uses Twitter and works on it.
That model works for many successful companies.
I just asked Jack Dorsey why he doesn’t donate towards helping ActivityPub.
Will he reply? Because I really want to know
Here’s how Jack Dorsey want to monetize Bluesky:
1. Subscriptions
2. Ads
3. Commerce/Transactions
Jack Dorsey says he doesn’t believe a company should own a protocol platform and distribution.
Glad to hear he regrets Twitter.
Sooo… when will Bluesky connect to multiple nodes?
At least Jack Dorsey doesn’t want to run Bluesky through a DAO.
Jack Dorsey says if AT protocol has a CEO, it fails.
I agree.
I guess Bluesky should decentralize soon.
Jack Dorsey doesn’t want AT protocol to be capable of DMs.
That means they’re probably not coming to Bluesky either.
@atomicpoet that's probably a good idea.. though mentioned users only posts seems good for stuff that doesn't really strictly need privacy, just quietness?
@thisismissem Why not integrate Bluesky with something like Matrix?
@atomicpoet simplicity? idk, maybe not every app needs to be everything? Especially with federated or decentralized identity
@thisismissem I’ve seen numerous social media platforms try to go without DMs. It rarely works.
@atomicpoet mmm, yeah, I guess integrating matrix would be okay, but iirc it doesn't have portable identity?
@thisismissem True. I guess that’s another thing that will need to be built.
@atomicpoet or adapted/evolved?