hachyderm.io is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Hachyderm is a safe space, LGBTQIA+ and BLM, primarily comprised of tech industry professionals world wide. Note that many non-user account types have restrictions - please see our About page.

Administered by:

Server stats:

10K
active users

This Schmidt Shit is going to go down in history as emblematic of…however our present era is viewed in hindsight, and it won’t be kind.

“We can’t stop the planet from dying, so society should dump all its money into my Ouija board business!”

It’s crap on the level of “I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half,” Nero fiddling as Rome burns, “We must join with Sauron.” Just willful self-immolation. 🧵

From @breadandcircuses: climatejustice.social/@breadan

Climate Justice SocialBread and Circuses (@breadandcircuses@climatejustice.social)Attached: 1 image THIS is what passes for brilliance in the US Capitalist Empire... ________________________________ Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt says it's time to fully invest in AI infrastructure because climate goals are too lofty to reach. Schmidt's comments came at an AI summit in Washington DC on Tuesday, where he addressed the crowd and gave his thoughts on the future of artificial intelligence. "All of that will be swamped by the enormous needs of this new technology," Schmidt said. "Because it's a universal technology, and because it's the arrival of an alien intelligence… we may make mistakes with respect to how it's used, but I can assure you that we're not going to get there through conservation." Schmidt said he thinks "we're not going to hit the climate goals anyway because we're not organized to do it." "Yes, the needs in this area will be a problem, but I'd rather bet on AI solving the problem than constraining it and having the problem," Schmidt said. ________________________________ If this view holds sway, we are truly doomed. FULL STORY -- https://archive.ph/jzlfB #Environment #Climate #ClimateChange #Capitalism #BusinessAsUsual

Agree with @dave_andersen, it really is — and I think my Ouija board comparison is not off the mark: the SV billionaires locked in a small room sniffing each others’ farts are strongly reminiscent of the way the wealthy of the 19th century got sucked into the rise of “spiritualism” (seances, etc).

hachyderm.io/@dave_andersen/11

I’m not the first person to notice the connection between spiritualism and AI mania. I remember seeing a thoughtfully worked out blog post on how LLMs exploit some of the same cognitive traps as magic tricks, but I’m now struggling to find it. I did find this interesting-looking book, though:

academic.oup.com/book/35192

Especially relevant:

academic.oup.com/book/35192/ch

OUP AcademicBelieving in Bits: Digital Media and the SupernaturalAbstract. Situated at the theoretical interface between the fields of media studies and religious studies, Believing in Bits advances the idea that religio
Paul Cantrell

Once you see the connection between LLMs and psychics / seances / spiritualism, it’s hard to unsee. At the center: people •want• to believe, and that is powerful. Thinking of modern-day SV, listen to some of the stories of how con artists used spiritualism…

…as a business: history.com/news/ghost-hoax-sp

…as wartime subterfuge: thisiscriminal.com/episode-234

…as almost a kind of therapy: thisiscriminal.com/episode-79-

HISTORY · How a Hoax by Two Sisters Helped Spark the Spiritualism CrazeBy Becky Little

Is there a “there” there with LLMs and other contemporary forms of AI? Consider this story of a photographer who prepared hoax photographs of ghosts in the early days of photography, and suckered even Mary Todd Lincoln:

thisiscriminal.com/episode-159

Is there a “there” there with using double exposures in photography? Sure! But step zero is completely giving up on the idea that you’re photographing ghosts — or in the case of AI, creating “intelligence.”

thisiscriminal.comEpisode 159: Spiritual Developments (2.26.2021)One Sunday afternoon, a man named William Mumler decided to take a self portrait. He said he was alone in the photography studio, but as the photograph developed, he saw something very strange—the image of someone else, sitting beside him.

The trouble is that giving up on the promise of photographing ghosts won’t let you extract •nearly• as much money from investors.

The blurb:

❝Because of the road sweeper's belief in him, a dragon saves the city of Wu from the Wild Horsemen of the north.❞

That is flatly wrong.

What the road sweeper actually says to the old man who claims to be a dragon (but nobody believes him) is:

❝I don’t know whether you are a dragon or not, but if you are hungry and thirsty, please do me the honor of coming into my humble home.❞

The dragon saves the city not because of the road sweeper’s •belief•, but because of his •kindness•.

The story couldn’t be clearer on this point. Isn’t it fascinating that our culture consistently sets people up to misread it so?

@inthehands also that we live in a society that demands children *believe* — so many children’s stories centre belief as crucial — and that we never openly criticize people who deeply believe the most bizarre things.

@inthehands
#PostOfTheMonth:
One Sunday afternoon, a man named William Mumler decided to take a self portrait. He said he was alone in the photography studio, but as the photograph developed he saw something very strange—the image of someone else, sitting beside him.

Mumler’s “spirit photograph” was championed by advocates of Spiritualism, who saw it as evidence that the living could communicate with the dead

@inthehands The thing I have noticed myself also is... these people are primed, by a mixture of (in hindsight, pseudo-scepticism) of anthropocentric forms of human intelligence (without really having the depth of empathy to reflect this further) and (sci-fi) priming that (alien) intelligences can and will be built and were hard to recognize, that the ELIZA effect hits them really, really hard. They're expecting sceptics that hit a confirmation signal and plunged down the confirmation bias hole.