hachyderm.io is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Hachyderm is a safe space, LGBTQIA+ and BLM, primarily comprised of tech industry professionals world wide. Note that many non-user account types have restrictions - please see our About page.

Administered by:

Server stats:

10K
active users

@inthehands @adamshostack
Music and mathematics - and coding, and puzzles - do seem to use much the same kind of abilities.

But different people seem to deploy very different strategies. I think spatially; whether music or code I see it laid out in my mind's eye.

But my wife doesn't think spatially *at all.* And she is a graphic designer - a profession you'd think spatial reasoning is pretty important.

Paul Cantrell

@jannem @adamshostack
For sure. I think I've even seen reporting on some studies that found using fMRI that while some brain tasks are situated in similar locations for most everyone, others vary wildly from person to person? Can't remember whether I'm making that up….

@inthehands @jannem about 15 years ago I read a book by a Berkely prof who had some very principles critiques of fMRI study designs, and advocated that a lot of our thinking is embodied. I really wish I could find it.

@adamshostack @jannem
Sounds like good stuff. I probably already agree with it.

@adamshostack @inthehands
So; I'm a former computational neuroscientist - but not a specialist in imaging or gross anatomy.

At a larger scale, with otherwise intact brains, everybody has the same areas in much the same place. Much like with limbs, organs and so on. Yes, things can occasionally be mirrored, or vagaries of genetics or injury means you may have lost some functionality, but overall it's true.

And during an experiment you're not really relying too much on the exact position.

1/2

@adamshostack @inthehands
You look at the difference in activation between stimuli or no stimuli, and you don't get too hung up on exactly (by mm) where the activation is.

But there are real limits to imaging, and they do include simplifying assumptions that are not always true. A good research program controls for that. With a bad one you get results from a dead salmon.

But that is true for all research - and all human activity. If you do stuff badly, the results won't be good.