science writing & the use of "we":
this is me, a humble reader, begging nonfiction writers to please stop using "we" when they are referring to western science/society:
"for the first time, we are learning..."
"we first discovered x in..."
"until 1901, we didn't know..."
just because western science has only just discovered xyz, it doesn't mean that WE ALL were implicated.
many cultures around the world do not have the same ideas about stuff as those of us in the west (and if you want to get real, the west is made up of many subcultures, many of which are actively oppositional to the main society's values and skeptical of its mainstream knowledge).
additionally, many peoples' lived experiences with the natural world mean that they know things that western science hasn't yet documented (i'm thinking here of the "animals discovered using plants for medicine" research - those of us who live closely with animals know that all kinds of animals use plant medicine - including my cat, who has a specific grass she prefers when she needs to barf! not just any grass will do.)
if an author is totally wedded to the use of "we" when making extremely broad statements about belief and stuff, then please at least define it in the introduction: "in this book, when I use 'we', I am referring to the knowledges produced by western science, and beliefs that are common among people living in the west."
(and i hate to single anyone out, but science writers are the ones who seem to most love using "we" when they are referring to western science/history/culture.)